AGF

Shared Vocabulary

Canonical terminology used across all AGF documents.

AGF uses precise terminology throughout. When a term is used in a concept document, profile, or white paper, it carries the meaning defined here.

System Properties

TermMeaning
SafeThe system does not cause unintended harm
SecureThe system resists adversarial attack
DurableThe system survives failures, maintains state, and preserves governance guarantees over time
AuditableThe system produces evidence trails sufficient for compliance and forensic review
ObservableThe system emits structured events that enable monitoring, detection, and response

Architecture Terms

TermMeaning
RingA logical governance layer in the Rings Model (0=Execution, 1=Verification, 2=Governance, 3=Learning)
FabricCross-cutting infrastructure: events, identity, provenance, structured output, error handling
SubstrateThe agent operating environment: context, instructions, tools, workspace, memory
PrimitiveA named pattern for governed agentic systems (#1–#19)
GateAn explicit decision point where execution pauses for authorization
Adaptive gateA gate that relaxes as the system proves reliability through Trust Ladders
Mandatory gateA gate that never relaxes (irreversible actions, regulatory requirements)

Signal Protocol

SignalMeaning
PASSOutput accepted, move to next ring
REVISE(quality)Ring 1 says "not good enough, try again"
REVISE(context)Ring 2 says "the world changed, re-execute"
HALTSomething is fundamentally wrong, stop execution
GATEPause for human authorization
DELEGATEHand off to another agent with depth tracking
ERRORSomething broke; retry, degrade, or halt

Confidence Levels

Used throughout the framework to mark certainty:

LevelMeaning
Established patternProven across multiple domains. Strong evidence.
Informed proposalBased on our synthesis, not yet battle-tested at scale in agentic systems.
Open questionWe don't have great answers yet and say so.

Deployment Modes

ModeDescription
WrapperRings literally wrap execution. Sequential.
Middleware/InterruptRings fire at decision points (tool calls, data access).
Graph-EmbeddedRings run concurrently with execution.

Positioning Terms

TermMeaning
Agentic GovernanceAGF's category. Governance of systems with agency, autonomy, memory, tool use, and inter-agent collaboration. Narrower than AI governance.
Four verbsWhat AGF does: Synthesizes / Unifies / Prescribes / Operationalizes.
OTAA invariantEvery AGF primitive must be Observable, Traceable, Auditable, Agent-operable.
Dual-form principle"Machine-consumable, human-decidable." Every primitive exists in human and machine form simultaneously.
Tempo taxonomyWire-speed enforcement (<1ms) / near-realtime supervision (sec–min) / human-speed governance (hours–weeks).
Wire-speedSub-millisecond governance enforcement — deterministic policy, identity, tool allowlists, sandbox.
Architectural substrateAGF's position at Layer 0 of the seven-layer stack. The shared model onto which other governance layers project.

Harness Terms

TermMeaning
HarnessThe governance envelope around an AI agent — declarative source plus runtime enforcement adapters. Industry formula: Agent = Model + Harness.
Tier 0 / 1 / 2Harness tiers: Provider (model vendor), Agent (per-agent, maps to AGF Security Fabric), Orchestration (cross-agent, maps to AGF Security Governance).
Source → Build → RuntimeHarness workflow: YAML/Markdown source → harness build → SDK adapters enforce at call time. Terraform analogy.
Hard / Adaptive / Behavioral constraintsHard = machine-enforced, never relaxes. Adaptive = machine-enforced, trust-dependent. Behavioral = instruction-based, not mechanically enforced. Only hard and adaptive are citable as controls.

Governance: Five Distinct Senses

"Governance" carries five distinct senses across AGF material. Qualifiers are required whenever any sense other than #1 is meant.

SenseCanonical qualified formExample
1. The frameworkAGF (never "governance" alone)"AGF synthesizes NIST, OWASP, CSA…"
2. Ring 2the Governance ring or Ring 2"Ring 2 (Governance) evaluates policy before release."
3. Program maturity (AGF L1–L5)AGF program maturity"The organization's AGF program maturity is L2 Foundation."
4. Primitive #8 gatesGovernance Gates (capitalized)"Governance Gates fire when a release requires authorization."
5. NIST CSF Govern functionNIST CSF Govern"AGF's Ring 2 aligns to NIST CSF Govern at program scope."

Bare "governance" as a noun is reserved for sense #1 or deliberate adjectival use ("governance posture"). Decision: D10.

Observability: Three Distinct Layers

"Observability" appears in three places in AGF. The three are not synonyms — they compose.

LayerCanonical nameRole
EmissionPrimitive #10 — Event-Driven ObservabilityFabric primitive. Every ring emits structured events through a canonical envelope.
ConceptAgentic ObservabilityUnified correlation layer. One event stream, three detection perspectives (quality, security, governance).
ProfileObservability ProfileRole-based implementation guide for observability engineers and SREs.

Primitive #10 emits. Agentic Observability correlates. The Profile implements. Decision: D10.

Gate Vocabulary

AGF's gate-related vocabularies form a four-part vocabulary of distinct, scoped enums. They are NOT alternative spellings of one concept. See DECISIONS.md #8 (Gate Vocabulary Disambiguation).

TermDefinition
Gate BoundaryWhere a Gate Resolution or Domain Outcome occurs. Dual-form (DECISIONS.md #5) and GDR emission (#9) are required at every gate boundary.
Ring Control SignalThe Composability Interface enum: PASS / REVISE / HALT / GATE / DELEGATE / ERROR. How primitives in adjacent rings signal each other. Emits observability events (Primitive #10), not GDRs.
Gate ResolutionThe Primitive #8 (Governance Gates) enum: APPROVE / REJECT / MODIFY / DEFER / ESCALATE. The authorizer's response when a gate fires. Also the return value of the GATE Ring Control Signal. Emits a GDR.
Domain OutcomeDomain-specific gate decision enums. Each domain application defines its own outcome vocabulary that maps onto Gate Resolutions. Tool Gate's Authorized / Conditionally Authorized / Denied is the first reference application. Emits a GDR.
Governance Decision Record (GDR)AGF's canonical audit artifact at gate boundaries. A single record format that serializes any Gate Resolution or Domain Outcome into an auditable record. See Governance Decision Record.

Composition Patterns

Four progressive architectures built from primitives. Canonical count: four. "Phase 1–5" language previously used on the Rings Model page is retired — use pattern names. Ring activation is a consequence of pattern selection.

PatternRings activeAdds
Minimum Viable ControlRing 0 + Fabric (minimal)#7, #14, #6, #10, #19 (minimal)
Validation Pipeline+ Ring 1#1, #2, #5, #13
Governed Decision Flow+ Ring 2#8, #9, #16, #17
Full Governed Agentic System+ Ring 3 (Learning)all 19

Hardening posture (a modifier, not a fifth pattern): Adversarial Robustness (#15) + Evaluation & Assurance (#18) + Trust Ladders (#11) applied within GDF, or as a precondition for entering Full Governed. Express as posture language — "a production-hardened Governed Decision Flow applying #11/#15/#18" — never as a named step.

See Composition Patterns for full detail. Decision: D10.

Maturity Levels

AGF L1–L5 is a program-level scale. Complementary to CSA ATF's per-deployment scale (Intern → Junior → Senior → Principal).

LevelLabelState
L1Non-existentAgents deployed, no formal governance. Most orgs today.
L2FoundationInventory + classification; Ring 0 + Ring 1 operational.
L3GovernedFull R0+R1+R2; observability at correlation; Trust Ladders calibrating.
L4AdaptiveRing 3 operational; self-improving cycles.
L5OptimizedFull framework; governance as competitive advantage.

For the complete vocabulary — including positioning pillars, harness terms, identity & credentialing terms (DIDs, VCs, NHIs, JIT credentials, behavioral attestation), and standards abbreviations — see the canonical source.

On this page