AGF

Core Concepts in Order

A sequenced orientation to AGF's core concepts — what to read and in what order to build a working mental model of the framework.

AGF has a lot of named constructs. Read in the wrong order, they pile up. Read in the right order, they build on each other cleanly.

This page is the orientation path. Each concept links to its canonical reference doc. Work through them top-down and you'll have a working mental model in about 30 minutes.

1. What AGF Is

AGF is a reference architecture — a synthesis of NIST, OWASP, CSA, ISO, EU AI Act, OpenTelemetry, and academic research into a composable governance framework for agentic systems. Start here. It's the single-sentence definition plus the problem AGF is trying to solve.

Key takeaways before moving on:

  • AGF synthesizes; it does not invent
  • The contribution is the composition, not the individual patterns
  • Every claim is labeled with a confidence level

2. The Rings Model

Four concentric rings describe where governance happens: Execution (Ring 0), Verification (Ring 1), Governance (Ring 2), Learning (Ring 3). Cross-cutting this: the Fabric (data contracts, events, identity, errors) and the Security spine.

Key takeaways before moving on:

  • Rings are not a lifecycle or a pipeline — they are concurrent concerns
  • Rings emit signals to each other via the Composability Interface
  • Rings 0+1 are the execution loop; Ring 2 gates; Ring 3 learns

3. The 19 Primitives

The 19 Primitives are named patterns drawn from distributed systems, security engineering, compliance, and control theory — placed into the Rings Model. Each primitive has a primary lineage (NIST, OWASP, CSA, academic, industry) and a specific AGF contribution (placement, naming, invariant).

Key takeaways before moving on:

  • Primitives are not inventions — see the Primitive Attribution for sourcing
  • Seven named tensions exist between primitives; each has an architectural invariant
  • Read the attribution table before accepting any novelty claim

4. Gate Vocabulary and the Governance Decision Record

Four scoped gate vocabularies disambiguate what used to be one overloaded word "gate":

  • Ring Control Signals — how primitives across rings signal each other (PASS / REVISE / HALT / GATE / DELEGATE / ERROR)
  • Gate Resolutions — the Primitive #8 enum (APPROVE / REJECT / MODIFY / DEFER / ESCALATE) returned when a gate fires
  • Domain Outcomes — domain-specific enums (e.g., Tool Gate Authorized / Conditionally Authorized / Denied) that map to Gate Resolutions
  • Governance Decision Record (GDR) — the canonical audit artifact emitted at every gate boundary

The Governance Decision Record is the machine-readable companion to the human-readable rationale. Every Gate Resolution and every Domain Outcome emits one.

5. Trust Ladders

Trust Ladders explain how agents earn autonomy. Trust is not granted by default — it's observed, calibrated, and promoted (or demoted) based on performance against gate resolutions over time. This is where Ring 2 and Ring 3 meet: governance watches, learning calibrates.

6. Composition Patterns and the Agentic Observability Layer

Composition Patterns describe the four ways AGF's rings compose in practice — from constrained single agents to full multi-ring self-improving systems. Each pattern implies a different Agentic Observability posture — the unified monitoring, detection, and response layer that turns ring events into signal for operators, security, and governance.

7. Relationship to Frameworks

Finally, how AGF relates to NIST, OWASP, CSA, ISO, EU AI Act, and the rest. The seven-layer stack explains where AGF sits (Layer 0, the substrate) and what it explicitly does not try to replace.

Or jump straight to a role profile: Security · Platform · GRC · AI Engineering · Observability.

On this page